Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38198 (HP)

SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CMP/21324/2025 · 2025-11-12

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sunil Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. CMP No.21324 of 2025 in Ex. Petition No.566 of 2025 12.11.2025 Present: Mr. M.A. Safee, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent-State. While placing on record communication dated 11.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Engineer-in-Chief, HP PWD, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 11.11.2025 passed by Engineer-in-Chief, HPPWD Nigam Vihar, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds that office of Land Acquisition Collector, Shimla has been directed to refix the pay of the petitioner, in terms of judgment, sought to be executed. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed. Needless to say, consequential benefits, in terms of refixation of pay, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably within two months from today. November 12, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge