CWP-8296- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (127) Kumari Upasana and others State of Haryana CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. in not deciding the application, compensation on account of death of Dharmender Singh, due to electrocution, propelled the petitioners to file the instant writ petition, under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking respondents, to pay the compen 2. advance notice of the instant petition, waives service and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No.1. He informs this Cour can be disposed of, with application dated 14.02.2025 (Annexure P accordance with the policy adopted by the distribution licencee concerned, for grant of compensation, on account of electrocution. -2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kumari Upasana and others Versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Manish Deswal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Bhupender Singh, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) The indolent and lackadaisical approach in not deciding the application, preferred by the petitioners, compensation on account of death of Dharmender Singh, due to electrocution, propelled the petitioners to file the instant writ petition, under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking respondents, to pay the compensation. Learned counsel for the State, who is present in the Court, on advance notice of the instant petition, waives service and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No.1. He informs this Cour can be disposed of, with a mandamus upon the respondent No.6, application dated 14.02.2025 (Annexure P accordance with the policy adopted by the distribution licencee concerned, for grant of compensation, on account of electrocution. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8296-2025 Date of Decision : 24.03.2025 …Petitioners Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Bhupender Singh, DAG, Haryana The indolent and lackadaisical approach of the respondent No.6, preferred by the petitioners, seeking compensation on account of death of Dharmender Singh, due to electrocution, propelled the petitioners to file the instant writ petition, under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a mandamus upon the Learned counsel for the State, who is present in the Court, on advance notice of the instant petition, waives service and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No.1. He informs this Court that the instant petition a mandamus upon the respondent No.6, to decide the application dated 14.02.2025 (Annexure P-4), in a time bound manner, in accordance with the policy adopted by the distribution licencee concerned, for grant of compensation, on account of electrocution. of the respondent No.6, seeking compensation on account of death of Dharmender Singh, due to electrocution, propelled the petitioners to file the instant writ petition, under Articles mandamus upon the Learned counsel for the State, who is present in the Court, on advance notice of the instant petition, waives service and accepts notice on that the instant petition to decide the 4), in a time bound manner, in accordance with the policy adopted by the distribution licencee concerned, for MANPREET SINGH 2025.03.28 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-8296- 3. for the State, the instant writ petition is the respondent No.6, petitioners, within a period of certified copy of this order/judgment. March 24, 2025 Manpreet -2025 In view of the specific statement suffered by the learned counsel for the State, the instant writ petition is disposed of the respondent No.6, to decide the application (supra), petitioners, within a period of three months, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order/judgment. 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In view of the specific statement suffered by the learned counsel disposed of, with a mandamus upon to decide the application (supra), so preferred by the three months, from the date of receipt of (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No In view of the specific statement suffered by the learned counsel , with a mandamus upon preferred by the three months, from the date of receipt of MANPREET SINGH 2025.03.28 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment