118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.906 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.03.2025 Vinod Kumar …..Appellant. Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others .....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA ***** Present:- Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) Learned counsel submits that apart from the prayer for counting his service for pension purpose, the appellant had also prayed for counting the period of service for seniority as well as for promotion. However, the said aspect has not been considered by the learned Single Judge. 2. In view thereto, learned counsel prays to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to file review-petition. 3. Granting liberty as prayed for hereinabove, this Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending civil misc. applications also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) March 26, 2025 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2025.04.02 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment