[2025:RJ-JP:26776] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.553/2023 Asha Agarwal W/o Sh. Giriraj Agrawal, Proprietor Of M/s Orgrain India, 25B, Lajras Lane, Christian Ganj, Ajmer- 305001, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Registrar Of Trade Marks, (Govt. Of India) Near Chanakyapuri Overbridge, Ghatlodiya, Ahmedabad (Guj.) 2. Organic India Private Limited, Unit 2, Gf, M-6 Uppal Plaza District Centre, Jasola, New Delhi - 110025. Through Authorised Signatory/owner/ Partner/ Proprietor/ Manager. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.D. Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Divyesh Maheshwari JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/07/2025 1. A limited prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondent No.1 to decide the application submitted by the petitioner seeking registration of trade marks. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for getting registered trade mark, an application was submitted on 28.09.2017 in the office of respondent No.1, but inspite of passing considerable time, till date the said application has not been decided, hence, appropriate directions be issued. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 has submitted objection to the said application, hence, the application has not been decided. [2025:RJ-JP:26776] (2 of 2) [CW-553/2023] 4. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the application seeking registration of trade mark submitted by the petitioner is pending before the respondents since last more than seven years, the respondents are expected to decide the said application expeditiously, as early as possible, instead of keeping the same pending for indefinite time. 5. In view of above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Registrar, Trade Marks to decide the application submitted by the petitioner expeditiously, as early as possible, not beyond the period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order after considering the objections submitted by the respondent No.2. 6. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/24