2025:HHC:41806 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Exe. Pt. No. 50 of 2025 Decided on : 04.12.2025 Veena Kumari and others …Petitioners Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) The Court stands informed that now the judgment in issue stands complied with, save and except that consequential benefits have not been paid. 3. In light of this development, these proceedings are closed, but with the observation that if any consequential benefits are to be paid to the petitioners and they have not been paid, then let the same be paid to the petitioners, within a period of two months from today. Pending miscellaneous 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:41806 application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge December 04, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)