Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38183 (AP)

MKUDISETTY SIVAIAH, KALAYANADURGAM, ANANTHAPUR DIST. v. THE STATE OF A.P., REP. BY P.P., HYDERABAD, & 2 OTRS.

CRLRC/275/2010 · 2025-07-23

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010697752010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 275 OF 2010 Between: 1. MKUDISETTY SIVAIAH, KALAYANADURGAM, ANANTHAPUR DIST., S/O. DORA SWAMY M.P.D.O. KALYANADURGAM, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P REP BY P P HYDERABAD 2 OTRS, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2. MUDISETTY RENUKA, W/O. SIVAIAH HOUSEWIFE R/O. UPPARAPALLI HO. VANGMALIA VEERABALLI MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. MUDISETTY BABU, S/O. SIVAIAH REP. BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER 2ND RESPONDENT R/O. UPPARAPALLI HO. VANGMALIA VEERABALLI MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P. No. 2058 of 2009 in M.C. No. 9 of 2009 dated 27-10-2009 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate of I Class: Rayachoty. IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP 390 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the orders passed in Crl.M.P. No. 2058 of 2009 in M.C. No. 9 of 2009 dated 27-10-2009, pending disposal of Crl.R.C. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER:- This Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., is filed aggrieved by the order dated 27.10.2009 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rayachoty, in Crl.M.P.No.2058 of 2009 in M.C.No.9 of 2009 granting interim maintenance to the petitioners. 2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 3. This Court has called for the status report from the concerned Court and the report is submitted stating that case was transferred to learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rayachoty, and it was disposed of on 06.06.2016. This Court feels that the revision petition filed against the interim orders in M.C became infructuous. 4. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as Infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 24.7.2025 TJN 179 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 275 OF 2010 Dated: 24.7.2025 TJN