Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38182 (AP)

M. Narasimhappa v. M. Chennappa

CRP/5338/2017 · 2025-06-18

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

I, ■I APHC010698602017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI HE THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5338 OF 2017 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the Order dated 10-8-2017 in CMA No. 19 of 2014 on the file of Hon'bJe II Addl. District Judge, Kurnool. Between: M. Narasimhappa, S/o. Late Rangaiah, aged 59 years, Pervali Village, Maddikera Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Petitioner AND M Chennappa, S/o. Rangaiah, aged 68 years, Pervali Village, Maddikera Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2017fCRPMP 6923 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the Operation of the Order dated 10-8-2017 in lA No. 226 of 2012 in OS No. 29 of 2012 on the file of the Hon’ble II Addl. District Judge, Kurnool, Pending disposal of the above CRP. to Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K RAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondent: SRI B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following order: APHC010698602017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5338/2017 Between; ...PETITIONER M. Narasimhappa AND ...RESPONDENT M Chennappa Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.K RAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondent; 1.B SARVOTHAM REDDY The Court made the following; 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION petition NO.5:^ ■!« ORDER: 1. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner represented that in the light of the subsequent developments, the in the Civil Revision Petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, no further orders cause are necessary in this Petition. 2. Recording the said submission, the Civil and other miscellaneous petitions, if as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. Revision Petition any, are therefore dismissed pending, if any. Sd/- A VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, I.The lind Additional District Judge, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Adoni, Kurnool, Kurnool District 3. One CC to SRI. K. RAMAMOHAN. Adoni, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI. B SARVOTHAM REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies nm HIGH COURT DATED:19/06/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 5338 OF 2017 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS