Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38180 (HP)

RAJEEV KUMAR DOGRA v. STATE OF HP AND ORS

CMP.M/2156/2025 · 2025-12-22

Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia, Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Rajeev Kumar Dogra vs. State of H. P. & Ors. Item No. D-11 CMP(M) No. 2156 of 2025 22.12.2025 Present: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavit of the applicant, the delay of 61 days, in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. LPA No. ________ of 2025 Appeal be registered. Notice. Mr. Arsh Rattan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents. Inter alia submits that the petitioner is seeking regularization from September, 2010, having been granted the benefits on 27.04.2016 alongwith the similar employees, who were also found mentioned in Annexure P-3. The Union as such had filed CWPOA No. 1453 of 2020, in which relief had been granted to the employees but only from the date of filing of the petition before the Tribunal. It is, thus, submitted that the learned Single Judge could have granted the same relief as such, by restricting the arrears from the date of filing of the petition in the year, 2024. It is further submitted that reply as such was not called for by the learned Single Judge while dismissing the petition in liminie. Counsel for the State prays for time to file para-wise comments. List on 12.03.2026. CMP No. 29920 of 2025 For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. (G. S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Jiya Lal Bhardwaj) Judge 22nd December, 2025(sanjeev)