Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38179 (CHH)

SMT. APARNA TRIPATHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/767/2025 · 2025-07-29

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:37383 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 767 of 2025 1 - Smt. Aparna Tripathi W/o Virendra Tripathi Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Biology), At Govt. Higher Secondary School Mohadi, Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (In Order Dated 22-07-2025 Its Wrongly Mention S/o Instead Of W/o) (Petitioner In Writ Petition) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 1 In Writ Petition) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, First Floor, C-Block, Indravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 2 In Writ Petition) 3 - The Divisional Joint Director Education Division, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 3 In Writ Petition) 4 - The District Education Officer District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 4 In Writ Petition) 5 - The Block Education Officer Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 5 In Writ Petition) 6 - Smt. Sushila Tirkey Presently Posted As Lecturer (Biology) At Govt. Higher Secondary School Mohadi, Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 6 In Writ Petition) 7 - Shri Nagendra Kumar Diwan Presently Posted As Lecturer (Biology) At Govt. Higher Secondary School Parsuli, Block Bagbahara, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 7 In Writ Petition) ... Respondent(s) Order Sheet 30/07/2025 Shri Sandeep Dubey, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S.P. Kale, Addl. Advocate General for the State. The present MCC has been filed by the petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 22.07.2025 passed 2 in WPS No.7292 of 2025. The modification sought for in the present MCC is that though the writ petition was disposed of with certain direction to Director Public Instructions to decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 10.07.2025 in objective manner, however inadvertently due to typographical mistake the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and further the direction part was omitted in the said order. Therefore, the counsel for the petitioner prays for modification of the said order dated 22.07.2025. The modification sought for is not opposed by the State counsel. Accordingly, the MCC stands allowed and paragraph -4 of the order dated 22.07.2025 passed in WPS No.7292 of 2025 is substituted as under : “Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of. The Committee headed by Director Public Instructions constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.07.2025 in objective manner in accordance with the Rationalization Instruction within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order and shall communicate the order to the petitioner without any further delay.” Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Inder