HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 13057 of 2012 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Sri S.N. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Gopal Chandra Saxena, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the Noida Authority. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no cause of action survives in the instant petition and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 24, 2025 Kirti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : A.K. Pandey, S.N. Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : K.N. Mishra, Kaushalendra Nath Singh, Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Rp Singh, V.K.S.Raghuvanshi (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Om Prakash .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru Secy. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad