Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38171 (BOM)

RAMESH HANMANT JAGDALE v. GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA and ORS.

IA/745/2020 · 2025-04-01

Gauri Godse

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

41-SA-592-2020.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 592 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 745 OF 2020 Ramesh Hanmant Jagdale … Appellant/Applicant Vs. Government of Maharashtra and Others… Respondents Mr. Nagesh Y Chavan for the Appellant. Mr. D. J. Haldankar, AGP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 1st APRIL 2025 ORDER : 1. After arguing the appeal for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. 2. Leave granted. The appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings as permissible in law. 3. Second appeal is disposed of with aforesaid liberty. 1/2 rrpillai RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2025.04.03 02:14:08 +0200 41-SA-592-2020.docx 4. In view of the disposal of the second appeal, pending interim application is disposed of as infructuous. 5. It is clarified that the appellant would be at liberty to seek benefit for condonation of delay in adopting appropriate proceedings. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2