Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38169 (RAJ)

NEERAJ SINGH S/O LATE DALBIR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8858/2025 · 2025-11-03

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44175] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8858/2025 1. Neeraj Singh S/o Late Dalbir Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Saini Mohalla, Hasanpur, Gadauli, Bharatpur Rajasthan, Presently Working As Case Worker, Department For Child Rights, Government Observation Home At Bharatpur Rajasthan. 2. Maan Mahendra S/o Shri Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Piryani, Ikran, Bharatpur Rajasthan, Presently Working As Counsellor, Department For Child Rights, Government Observation Home At Bharatpur Rajasthan. 3. Rajesh Kumar S/o Ashok Kumar, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Harijan Basti, Suraj Pole, Bharatpur Rajasthan, Presently Working As Counsellor, Department For Child Rights Government Observation Home At Bharatpur Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj). 2. The Joint Secretary To Government, Child Rights Department, Jaipur, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj). 3. The Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, 22, Raj Bhawan Road, Ambedkar Nagar, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Raj). 4. The Assistant / Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, District Bharatpur ( Raj). 5. Superintendent State Communication And Juvenile Home, Safe Place, Shewar- Mathura Maipara Road, Behind Mustard Research Center, Golpura Rover Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:44175] (2 of 3) [CW-8858/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Anokha Bai Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.372/2013, Chaturbhu and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26574/2018 and Shyam Murari and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14002/2020 submits that the writ petition be disposed of in same terms as the controversy raised herein is already settled by this Hon’ble Court. 2. Heard and considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 3. The controversy involved in the instant petition has already set at rest by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Anokha Bai Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and same is followed in subsequent judgment in case of Shyam Murari and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 4. The instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the each of the petitioners to submit separate representations within a period of one month from today. The respondents are directed to decide the separate representations of the each petitioners in the light of the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Anokha Bai (supra), separately within a period of three months thereafter and pass reasoned and speaking orders strictly in accordance with law. [2025:RJ-JP:44175] (3 of 3) [CW-8858/2025] 5. Having considered the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of with pending application, if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/12