Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38169 (HP)

RAJINDER PAL GARG AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/923/2025 · 2025-11-28

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:HHC:40689 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.923 of 2025 Decided on: 28.11.2025 Sh. Rajinder Pal Garg & another … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioners : Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State. Mr. Virender, Advocate, vice Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this petition, the petitioners have, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:- “a) Issue appropriate writ, order, or directoin directing Respondents to reconsider the notification dated 20.12.2024 as annexure P-4 and include the petitioners land in the Municipal Corporation Shimla in the ends of Justice and Fair play. b) Direct the respondents to decide the representation dated 23.12.2024 as annexure P-5 (colly) as submitted by the petitioners.” 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that in 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:40689 terms of the reply filed to the petition, post the filing of the representation by the petitioners, necessary action at the end of Deputy Commissioner stands taken, however, subsequent decision thereupon has to be taken by the State Government. He submits that interest of justice would be served in case the Authority concerned is directed to decide the representation within a time bound period after hearing the petitioners and after taking into consideration Annexure R-1 appended with the reply filed by respondent No.3, i.e. Deputy Commissioner, Shimla, H.P. Ordered accordingly. 3. Let the representation of the petitioners be decided by the Competent Authority after hearing the petitioners within six weeks from today in view of the reply of respondent No.3. The petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 28, 2025 (Rishi)