Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38169 (AP)

Neelapu Jyothi Prasad v. Neelapu Lakshmi

CRLRC/2510/2018 · 2025-07-03

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010695802018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2510/2018 Between: 1. NEELAPU JYOTHI PRASAD, S/O MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS OCC.PRIVATE COACH, R/O PEDDARELLI VEEDHI, SRIKAKULARN. ...PETITIONER AND 1. NEELAPU LAKSHMI, W/O NEELAPU JYOTHI PRASAD AGED 36 YEARS, OCC. TAILORING R/O PEDDA REIN VEEDHI, SRIKAKULAM. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA AND A.P., HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow the Criminal Revision Case by setting aside the Order dt. 6-7-2018 passed in CrI.M.P.No. 132 of 2018 in M.C.No. 62 of 2017 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-HI Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Srikakulam.and to grant such other relief IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the execution of the Order dt. 6- 7-2018 passed in CrI.M.P.No. 132 of 2018 in M.C.No. 62 of 2017 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-III Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Srikakulam, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. Y NARAPA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main case i.e., M.C.No.62 of 2017 was disposed of vide judgment dated 31.10.2019. 2. In view of the disposal of the main case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication. 3. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 04.07.2025 SCS 3 141 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2510 of 2018 Date:04.07.2025 SCS