Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38167 (CHH)

MOHD. NASBULAIN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2291/2023 · 2025-06-12

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:23807 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2291 of 2023 1 - Mohd. Nasbulain S/o Sheikh Mir Hasan Aged About 45 Years R/o Gram And Post - Sagar Sultanpur, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Sivaan (Bihar) 2 - Shabnam Khatun W/o Mohd. Nasbulain Aged About 36 Years R/o Gram And Post Sagar Sultanpur, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Sivaan (Bihar) 3 - Gajrala Parveen S/o Sheikh Mir Hasan Aged About 28 Years R/o Sagar Sultanpur, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Sivaan (Bihar) 4 - Kadir S/o Lt. Masuda Alam Aged About 47 Years R/o Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur (Bihar) 5 - Jahan Aara Khatun W/o Kadir Ahmed Aged About 46 Years R/o Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur (Bihar) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Superintendent of Police Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Station House Officer Police Station Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Sabina Khatun W/o Md Suhail Aged About 25 Years R/o Ward No., 11, Khadowapara, Ratanpur District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Ms. Mahima Chandra holding brief of Mr. Rahul Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent Nos.1 to 3 /State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 13.06.2025 1. Heard Ms. Mahima Chandra holding brief of Mr. Rahul Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with following prayers :- “It is, therefore, prayed that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to allow the petition and be pleased to quash the First Information Report bearing No. 120/2020 (Annexure P-1), and also the further charge sheet bearing No. 187/2022, lodged against the petitioners before Police Station Ratanpur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.), in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that she wants to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to challenge the order framing charges. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel submitted that the case is fixed for prosecution witnesses. 5. In that view of the matter, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to law if aggrieved by the order framing charges. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra