Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38165 (ALL)

SUNIL v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/11594/2025 · 2025-04-08

Krishan Pahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:51225 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11594 of 2025 Applicant :- Sunil Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Piyush Patel,Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Jai Kishan Chaurasia, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.211 of 2024, under Sections 376, 506 IPC and 67- A I.T. Act, 2000, Police Station Sinduriya, District Maharajganj with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The instant case is that of a consensual relationship between the two on the false promise of marriage. The victim is major aged about 21 years. The applicant is in jail since 04.08.2024 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Per contra, learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application and has stated that it has come up during investigation that the applicant had misused the Facebook and Instagram accounts and had posted the indecent photographs of the victim on it, as such, maligning her in the society. The said facts stands fortified by the electronic evidence, as such, the applicant is not entitled for bail. 6. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the applicant has posted the indecent photographs of the victim on Facebook and Instagram and tarnished her image, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. 7. The bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected. 8. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. Order Date :- 9.4.2025 (Ravi Kant) (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad