HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3533/2024 1. Sanjay Godara S/o Ramchandra Jat, R/o Tajsar, Fatehpur Sadar, Sikar, Rajasthan. 2. Ajay S/o Sitaram, R/o Tajsar, Fatehpur Sadar, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Rajendra S/o Birbal, R/o R/o Tajsar, Fatehpur Sadar, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/12/2025 1. By way of filing this criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for quashing the impugned FIR No. 68/2024 registered with Police Station Fathepur Sadar, Sikar for the offence under Sections 143, 341, 323, 307 and 506 of IPC. 2. As per the grounds taken in this petition, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case because of his old enmity with the complainant. It has also been stated that FIR No. 90/2017 was registered against the complainant party by the petitioners and in counterblast to the aforesaid, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the impugned FIR. It has also stated in the petition that on account of elections some quarrel (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3533/2024] took place between the parties during voting at the polling booth, Hence, interference of this Court is warranted. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the contents of the petition and submits that the allegations levelled in the impugned FIR reveal the commission of a cognizable offence and the same is required to be investigated by the Investigating Agency. Hence, interference of this Court is not warranted. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Whether the petitioners have been falsely implicated on account of the FIR No. 90/2017 registered against the complainant or not, or whether the petitioners have been implicated as an accused on account of old enmity. These disputed facts are required to be investigated by the Investigating Agency. 6. The correctness and genuineness of the allegations levelled in the FIR, cannot be adjudged by this Court while exercising its power contained under Section 528 of BNSS. Certainly, this task has been assigned to the Investigating Officer. 7. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to submit a representation along-with relevant documents in support of their contentions before the Investigating Officer. The Investigating Officer shall consider the same strictly in accordance with law. 8. Accordingly, the criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/5