APHC010692742016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26812/2016 Between: 1. M.S.V. PRASADA RAO,, S/O NARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC: SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR / ASSISTANT MANAGER, DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., R/O DOOR NO. 58- 14-96 3/4, NAVYA VIJAY HEIGHTS APARTMENTS, FLAT NO. 202, NEAR OLD POLICE QUARTERS, MARRIPALEM, VUDA LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM - 53009 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM CENTRAL OFFICE, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents' bank in not regularizing the services of the petitioner as System Administrator / Assistant Manager in the respondents' bank, as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1st respondent bank to consider the case of the petitioner to regularize the services of the petitioner as System Administrator / Assistant Manager in the respondents' bank with all consequential benefits and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 33186 OF 2016 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent bank to pay the minimum scale of pay attached to the post of System Administrator / Assistant Manager, during the pendency of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRISHNA RAO MODHALAVALASA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI The court made the following ORDER:- When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M. Krishna Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the subsequent developments in the lis, the petitioner’s services were regularized in the respondent Bank. The learned counsel, however, submits that he has no information about the petitioner’s benefits. The learned counsel, while submitting that no further cause survives in the matter, states that the matter may be closed with a liberty to seek recourse to law, if there is any discrepancy with regard to regularization benefits. 2. Smt. V. Uma Devi, learned counsel for the respondent Bank, is present through virtual mode. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to seek recourse to law, if so advised. 3 There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 14.08.2025 GVK 4 146 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.26812 of 2016 Date: 14.08.2025 GVK