RAJ KUMAR (since deceased) through his LRs v. STATE OF HP AND ANR
EX.P./2651/2025 · 2025-12-18
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38159 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38159 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No.2651 of 2025
Decided on 18th December 2025 Raj Kumar (since deceased) through his LRs
…Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another
…Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional
Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as there is a technical defect in the execution petition, because, memo of parties has been wrongly reflected therein, the petitioner be allowed to withdraw these proceedings with liberty to file a fresh execution.
2.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, so also pending miscellaneous applications, if any.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge December 18, 2025 (Vinod)