Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.1420 of 2025
Date of Decision: 19.12.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Anita Sharma ……...Petitioner Versus Ashish Kohli …....Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rocky and Mr. Sourav Sharma, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
While placing on record copy of office order dated 27.10.2025, issued under the signature of Director of School Education, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated, stands complied with.
2.
Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds that respondents after having considered case of the petitioner in light of judgment dated 29.11.2024, rendered in CWP No. 1638 of 2024, Mohit Sharma and Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors., have granted her benefit of higher pay.
2
3.
Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition, accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from the aforesaid compliance, shall be released, expeditiously, preferably, within three months.
December 19, 2025
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge