Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3815 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA PRASAD JANGID S/O NATHU LAL JANGID v. KOGTA FINANCIAL (INDIA) LTD.

CW/1101/2023 · 2025-05-09

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19759] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1101/2023 1. Rajendra Prasad Jangid S/o Nathu Lal Jangid, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 102, Balaiyo Ka Mohalla, Raisar Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur Second Address R.k. Furniture Through Proprietor Rajendra Prasad J. Jagid Ward No. 3, Balaiyo Ka Mohalla, Rayasar Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur. Third Address- Patta No.1, Village Raisar, Gram Panchayat Raisar, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur. Forth Address- Patta No.2, Village Raisar, Gram Panchayat Raisar, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur 2. Nathu Lal Jangid S/o Ghasi Ram Jangid, R/o Ward No. 3, Balaiyo Ka Mohalla, Rayasar Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur 3. Mamta Jangid W/o Rajendra Prasad Jangid, R/o 91, Raisar Bhangi, Rajput Mohalla, Raisar, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur. 4. Mishri Devi Jangid W/o Nathu Lal Jangid, R/o Ward No. 3, Balaiyo Ka Mohalla, Rayasar Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus 1. Kogta Financial (India) Ltd., Registered Office A-Kogta House, Azad Mohalla, Vijay Nagar (Raj.) Branch Office S- 1, Gopalbadi Near Ajmer Pulia, Opp. Metro Pillar No. 143, Jaipur Rajasthan Through Authorized Officer - Shri Shakti Singh 2. Ramesh Chand Soni S/o Radheshyam Soni, R/o 204, Khumar Mali Mohalla, Raisar, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Ms. Neha Sharma for Mr. Vineet Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND [2025:RJ-JP:19759] (2 of 2) [CW-1101/2023] Order 09/05/2025 Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the matter has already been settled between the parties and the SA No. 635/2022 pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur has been disposed of in the light of the aforesaid settlement vide order dated 17.01.2025. Counsel submits that hence under the changed circumstances, the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as rendered infructuous. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/75