MOHD ASHRAF SOHIL AND OTHERS v. U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT AND OTHERS
LPA/128/2023 · 2025-03-11
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi, Sanjeev Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3815 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3815 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
LPA No.128/2023
Mohd. Ashraf Sohil and others ….. Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. R.K.S.Thakur, Advocate
Vs
Union Territory of J&K and others ….. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 11.03.2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the writ petition, which has been disposed of by the learned Single Judge vide judgment impugned, the petitioners/appellants herein had, in the alternative, prayed for de-notification of the land for which the process for acquisition was initiated by the Collector concerned by issuance of notification under Section 4(1) of the J&K Land Acquisition Act on
07.05.2005. He, therefore, submits that the petitioners have now come to be informed that the said land stood already de-notified vide notification dated 21.05.2013 and, therefore, there remains no grievance with the appellants to pursue this appeal. He, therefore, submits that this appeal, with the aforesaid development, is rendered infructuous.
2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the appellants, nothing survives in this appeal and the same is, accordingly, dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Judge Jammu 11.03.2025 Vinod, PS
Sr. No. 15
2
Whether order is speaking: Yes/No
Whether order is reportable: Yes/No Vinod Kumar 2025.03.12 11.07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu