IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.17180 of 2025 Decided on: 03.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sunder Kumari …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Anr .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sureinder Prakash Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner seeks applicability of Arpana Bali Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh & Others.2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No.1853 of 2009 decided on 10.04.2013 2 preferred any representation for the redressal of her grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgments within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 3, 2025 Judge R.Atal