Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38126 (CHH)

VISHRAMSINGH NAG v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9058/2025 · 2025-08-21

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9058 of 2025 1 - Vishramsingh Nag S/o Gando Ram Nag, Aged About 55 Years At- Madkhada, Post Kotapad, District Kondagaon (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, At- Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - District Education Officer Kondagaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh 3 - Block Education Officer, Block Farasgaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgar. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lukesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate appeared through virtual mode For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 22/08/2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 05/06/2025 (Annexure- P/1) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Primary School Kolanga to Primary School, Kadenaar, Block Kondagaon under the SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.08.23 11:11:36 +0530 2 rationalization instructions. The said transfer order was passed after declaring him surplus there. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner, by passing the reasoned order in view of the grievance raised by the petitioner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika