CHANDI SHARMA @ CHANDI CHARAN SHARMA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./7088/2025 · 2025-12-12
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38124 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38124 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:37376
--1-- A.B.A. No. 7088 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 7088 of 2025
---- Chandi Sharma @ Chandi Charan Sharma, aged about 36 years, S/o Mihir Sharma, R/o Murtitand, PO – Chikasia, PS – Chas (MU), District – Bokaro, Jharkhand
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Dr. (Mrs.) Vandana Singh, Advocate
For the State
:- Shree Prakash Jha, Advocate
---- 02/12.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No.119 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 221, 132, 324(2), 121(1), 121(2), 125(a), 125(b), 351(2), 352 and 111(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)-II-cum-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bokaro.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the scuffle took place between two groups and there are 19 named accused persons and the FIR was also registered against 20 to 25 unknown persons. She further submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and subsequently the name of the petitioner has come. She then submits that the named accused persons have already
2025:JHHC:37376
--2-- A.B.A. No. 7088 of 2025
been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in ABA No.6792 of 2025. She next submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.12 of the petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioner that he was also present at the spot.
5. Considering that the scuffle took place between two groups and the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the named accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in the aforesaid ABA and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.12 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)-II-cum-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bokaro in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No.119 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 12.12.2025 Sangam/