2025:HHC:40187 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.468 of 2019 Decided on : 26.11.2025 __________________________________________________________ Sunil Chand .....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner: Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2-State. Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 6. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Learned Counsel, on Instructions received from petitioner [Sunil Chand] states that due to intervening and subsequent events, coupled with the fact that petitioner stands promoted, petitioner is not interested to pursue with instant proceedings. [Statement is taken on record] 2. Prayer being innocuous, is not opposed. 3. Accordingly, in terms of the Statement of Learned Counsel for petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of as infructuous alongwith all pending 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:40187 miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge November 26, 2025 [Bhardwaj]