APHC010692172017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] SATURDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31134/2017 Between: 1. YENUMULA MADHAVA REDDY,, S/0. Y. NARSA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: ASSISTANT MANAGER, (RETD.), THE PRAKASAM DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, R/O. FLAT NO. 302, S.S.R. TOWERS, MANGAMOR ROAD, MARRICHETTU COLONY, ONGOLE-523 002, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE & COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVAHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COOPERATIVE REGISTRAR, OF COOP. SOCIETIES, ANDHRA PRADESH, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE PRAKASAM DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL, BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE MANAGING COMMITTEE THE PRAKASAM, DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 MRK,J W.P.No.31134 of 2017 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in not acting upon the amended provisions of G.O. Ms. No. 102, Finance and Planning (HR.IV-FR) Department, dated 27.6.2017, as amended in G.O. Ms. No. 138, Finance (HR.IV-FR) Department, dated 8.8.2017, issued by the 1st respondent, which was upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, dated 9.8.2017 in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 13623 of 2017 and 14033-34 of 2017 and batch, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, being violative of Arts.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice and unconstitutional, and consequently set aside the same, and pass such other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 38800 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4, to reinstate and continue the petitioners in service till he attaining age of 60 years, pending the disposal of the above Writ Petition, and pass such other and further order or orders as this Honible Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA S LANKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI 2. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 3. RAVI KUMAR C 3 MRK,J W.P.No.31134 of 2017 The Court made the following Order: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of subsequent events, the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication in the matter and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date:30.08.2025 KPV 4 MRK,J W.P.No.31134 of 2017 128 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No:31134 of 2017 30.08.2025 KPV