IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 144 of 2025 Date of Decision: 12.11.2025 _______________________________________________________ Madan Lal …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Azmat Hayat Khan, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Careful perusal of the compliance affidavit reveals that mandate contained in the order/judgment sought to be executed stands duly complied with, which fact has been duly acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 12, 2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?