MISS PRAMILA RAJARAM SHAH AND ORS v. SHRI RAJENDRA BAPULAL SHAH AND ANR
IA/3662/2025 · 2025-03-10
Shri Madhav J Jamdar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38101 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38101 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
24-IA-3662-2025.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3662 OF 2025 IN INCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.313 OF 2019 Pramila Rajaram Shah & Ors. …Applicants Versus Rajendra Bapulal Shah & Anr. …Respondents Mr. Prashant R. Suryawanshi i/b. Mr. Gajanan M. Savagave, for the Applicants. Mr. Sudhir Prabhu, for the Respondent No.1. CORAM:
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED :
10th MARCH 2025 P. C.:
1. Heard Mr. Suryawanshi, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicants and Mr. Prabhu, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1.
2. The present Interim Application is preferred for bringing on record the legal heirs and representatives of the deceased Applicant No.3. The Applicant No.3 passed away on 26th November Sonali SONALI MILIND PATIL Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL Date: 2025.03.10 14:28:37 +0530
24-IA-3662-2025.DOC 2021 and the Interim Application is taken out on 26th February
2025.
3. As there is delay in filing the Interim Application, Mr. Prabhu, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 strongly opposes the Interim Application.
4. For the reasons set out in the Interim Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c). Amendment be carried out within a period of three weeks from today. Re- verification is dispensed with.
5. Accordingly, the Interim Application is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Sonali