IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20182 of 2025 Decided on: 22nd December, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Harender Kumar & Ors. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Chander Shekhar Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishawadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be content if the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authorities to decide their representation dated 13.08.2025 (Annexure P-4) in a time bound manner in view of the law laid down by this Court in CWP No. 8148/2022, titled as 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Yashwant Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & Ors. decided along with connected matters on 21.03.2024. 3. Prayer, being innocuous, is considered and allowed. 4. Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners within a period of six weeks from today by passing a detailed and reasoned order strictly in terms of the aforesaid judgment. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Sushil Kukreja) December 22, 2025 Judge Rohit