HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10869/2025 1. Mahendra Singh Gurjar Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad Gurjar, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Opposite Sub District Hospital, Phagi, District Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Rajesh Kumar Chandlani Son Of Shri Mohan Lal, Resident Of Opposite Sub District Hospital, Phagi, District Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Chhoturam Gurjar Son Of Shri Gangaram Gurjar, Resident Of Opposite Sub District Hospital, Phagi, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Nagar Palika Phagi, District Jaipur, Through Its Executive Officer. 2. Gram Sewak, Gram Panchayat Phagi, Panchayat Samiti Phagi, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Pandey For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 22/07/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned notice dated 14.02.2025 issued by the Municipal Board, Phagi directing the petitioner to deposit the due arrears of rent of the shop premises. 2. Counsel submits that the rent up to the year 2024 has already been deposited and no arrears are due. Counsel submits that for balance payment of due arrears after January, 2025, the petitioners went in the office of the (2 of 2) [CW-10869/2025] respondents to deposit the same, but they refused to accept the same. Counsel submits that the petitioners are ready and willing to deposit the entire due amount and its outstanding, if the dues are explained by the respondents in writing. 3. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions made by counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to submit a detailed comprehensive representation in the office of the Municipal Board, Phagi within a period of one week from today. 4. In case, such representation is submitted within above stipulated time, it is expected from the respondent No.1 to decide the same by providing him the details of due arrears of rent within a period two weeks thereafter, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. Thereafter, the petitioner would deposit the entire due arrears within a period of one week. 5. For a period of four weeks, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner. 6. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 7. It goes without saying that if the petitioners fail to deposit the rent and due arrears of rent, the respondents would be at liberty to proceed further against the petitioners in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/39