APHC010691372012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1697/2012 Between: 1. S.RAMESH, S/O APPALA RAJU, OCC: MOTOR VEHICLES INSPECTOR, ICHAPURAM, I/C TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. Through the S.H.O., Tekkali P.S., Srikakulam Dist. ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto allow this Crl.R.C., by setting-aside the Docket Order dated 07.06.2012 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1671 of 2012 in C.C.No. 96 of 2011 on the file of the Judl. First Class Magistrate, Tekkali, Srikakulam Dist. IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CRLRCMP 2607 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Docket Order dated 07.06.2012 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1671 of 2012 in C.C.No. 96 of 2011 on the file of the Judl. First Class Magistrate, Tekkali, Srikakulam Dist., pending disposal of the Crl.R.C. Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. SYED GHOUSE BASHA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 07.06.2012 passed by the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tekkali, in Crl.M.P.No.1671 of 2012 in CC.No.96 of 2011. 2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State. 3. The Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that CC.No.96 of 2011 itself has been disposed of on 18.02.2020. To verify the same, e-court’s case status report is obtained, which shows the disposal of CC.No.96 of 2011 and the case ended in acquittal. 4. In view of the disposal of the CC.No.96 of 2011, this Court finds that this criminal revision case is filed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1671 of 2012 in CC.No.96 of 2011 would become infructuous. 5. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 02.09.2025 SCH 4 196 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1697 OF 2012 Dated: 02.09.2025 SCH