IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL P RADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1398 of 2025 Date of Decision: 18.12.2025 ___________________________________________________________ Om Parkash ……...Petitioner Versus Shri Nipun Jindal …....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: Mr. Sunil Dutt Gautam, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate. ____________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 17.12.2025, issued under the signatures of Managing Director, HRTC, Shimla, learned counsel representing respondent states that respondent, after having considered the case of the petitioner in light of mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, has rejected the same. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned counsel representing respondent and as such, no action of respondent can be said to be contumacious. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly the same is disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in the appropriate Court of 2 law, laying therein challenge to order passed in purported compliance of mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated. December 18, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge