Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38076 (CHH)

TULSA DEVI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4082/2025 · 2025-07-31

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 4 2025:CGHC:37888 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4082 of 2025 Tulsa Devi W/o Shri Hariram Raghuvanshi Aged About 71 Years R/o Village Chiraipani, Indira Awas Post Raigarh Tah, And District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - The Tahsildar Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 01/08/2025 1. By way of the instant petition the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent authorities to consider and decide the application for correction of wrong entries made in the revenue record with respect to the land bearing Khasra No.10, total area 13.56 acres, situated in village Chiraipani, P.H. No.14, Tehsil & ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.08.06 10:42:24 +0530 2 / 4 District Raigarh. 2. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- 10.1 That the Hon’ble Court be pleased to call for the entire records in connection of the petitioner’s cases. 10.2 That the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent authorities to consider and decided the pending application for correcting wrong entries in the revenue record dated 20.09.2024 (Ann. P/7). 10.3 Any other order that the Hon’ble Court deems fit and necessary in the circumstances of the case be also passed. 10.4 That the cost of the petition be also awarded to the petitioners. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that in the revenue record for the year 2021-22, the subject land has been shown as Government land/service land whereas the said land earlier was recorded in the name of the petitioner and how and when the name of the petitioner has been deleted, no any information and notice has been given to the petitioner and petitioner was not having any knowledge about the said fact. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on 20/09/2024 the petitioner has submitted an application under Section 115 of the 3 / 4 CG Land Revenue Code, 1959 to the Tehsildar Raigarh for correction of incorrect entry in the land record, however, the Respondent authorities have not decided the application submitted by the petitioner and it is pending for consideration till date, therefore, it is prayed that the respondent authority may be directed to decide the aforesaid application as early as possible within a stipulated time period. 5. Per contra, learned State counsel submits that they are ready to decide the pending application of the petitioner. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the documents with utmost circumspection. 7. Considering the fact that the petitioner’s application under Section 115 of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959 dated 20/09/2024 is pending before the Tehsildar, Raigarh, District Raigarh, the said authority is directed to decide the application filed by the petitioner dated 20/09/2024 within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the petitioner is also directed to file copy of this order along with all the relevant documents before the Respondent No.4 within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall not be 4 / 4 influenced by any observation made by this Court in this order and shall decide the application of the petitioner on its own merits in accordance with law. 9. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu