Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010678712018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32621/2018 Between:
1. P.RANGA REDDY, S/O. P. NAGI REDDY, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O.
D.NO.6-76, BUCHAYYAGARIPALLI VILLAGE, BUKKAPATNAM MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. P.AMARNATH, S/O.P.GANGANNA, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.11-1-482-29, FLAT NO.506, SAIRAM RESIDENCY, ARAVINDA NAGAR, ANANTAPUR. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IV TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. SHAIK ABUSALEHA, S/O SHAIK KHAJA MOHIDDIN, AGED 41 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.12-1-940, SAI NAGAR, 7TH CROSS, ANANTAPUR. 5. SHAIK MOHAMMAD SIDDIK, S/O. SHAIK MAHABOOB SAB, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.26-278, MOMIN STREET, OLD TOWN, ANANTAPUR. 6. MOHAMMAD SHAFI, S/O. T. FAKRODDIN SAB, AGED 67 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.13/3/9, GULZARPET, ANANTAPUR. 7. MOHAMMAD SHAFI, S/O. T. FAKRODDIN SAB, AGED 62 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.13/3/9, GULZARPET, ANANTAPUR. 8. ABUSALEHA, S/O T. FAKRODDIN SAB, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O.
D.NO.15/756, KAMALNAGAR, ANANTAPUR. 9. MOHAMMAD JEELAN, S/O. T. FAKRODDIN SAB, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.15/756, GULZARPET, ANANTAPUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in
2
nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 and 3 in taking appropriate action in pursuant to the petitioners representation Dt.13.06.2018 for providing police protection so as to implement the orders passed in I.A.No.276 of 2018 in O.S.No.158 of 2018 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Anantapur for protection of plaint schedule property in Sy.No.235-2 of Plot No.13 of Anantapur Municipal Town bounded by East- Road, South- Road, West- House bearing No.6-4- 1144 in Plot No.14, South- Road admeasuring E-W- 66 Ft., N-S- 66 Ft., is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents police to provide police protection in respect of the plaint schedule property in pursuant to the orders passed in I.A.No.276 of 2018 in O.S.No.158 of 2018 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Anantapur and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2.
MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“ .... to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 and 3 in taking appropriate action in pursuant to the petitioners representation Dt.13.06.2018 for providing police protection so as to implement the orders passed in I.A.No.276 of 2018 in O.S.No.158 of 2018 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Anantapur for protection of plaint schedule property in Sy.No.235-2 of Plot No.13 of Anantapur Municipal Town bounded by East- Road, South- Road, West- House bearing No.6-4-1144 in Plot No.14, South- Road admeasuring E-W- 66 Ft., N-S- 66 Ft., is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents police to provide police protection in respect of the plaint schedule property in pursuant to the orders passed in I.A.No.276 of 2018 in O.S.No.158 of 2018 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Anantapur and to pass ....”
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that petitioners have worked out their remedy before the competent Civil Court and that no cause of
3
action survives for adjudication and that Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for official respondents is in attendance. 4. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 32621 of 2018
16.07.2025
Mjl /*