VINAY SHANKAR SRIVASTAVA v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND 3 OTHERS
WRIB/1362/2025 · 2025-04-10
Chandra Kumar Rai
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38074 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38074 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:53507 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1362 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinay Shankar Srivastava Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashi Kant Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
1. Heard Mr. Shashi Kant Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. The instant petition has been filed for the following relief:
"issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent no.1 to decide the restoration application dated 9.3.2022 filed in Revision No.359/1998 (Sahab Lal vs. Ambika Prasad & others) within stipulated period, specified by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the time barred restoration application filed by the petitioner is pending before the respondent no.1/ Deputy Director of Consolidation since 9.3.2022, as such, appropriate direction be issued for expeditious disposal for the aforementioned pending restoration application.
4. I have considered the argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records.
5. There is no dispute about the fact that time barred restoration application filed by the petitioner against the order dated 22.7.1982 is pending before respondent no.1.
6. No case for expeditious disposal of time barred restoration application is made out.
7. The writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 Rameez Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad