Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:40768 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Civil Revision No. 40 of 2022 Decided on: 28.11.2025 ____________________________________________________ Himachal Pradesh Housing and Urban Development Authority (HIMUDA) and Anr. ……….. Petitioners Versus Vivek Sharma and Anr. ……….Respondents ____________________________________________________
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners : Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Roop Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. : Mr. Gaurav Chaudhary, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. ____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (
oral)
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties submit that the case wherefrom the present proceedings have arisen, has been dismissed as withdrawn.
2. In view thereof, the present petition has become infructuous. The petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge November 28th, 2025 Susheel 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?