ADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/4419/2025 · 2025-08-18
Shri Arvind Kumar Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38068 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38068 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:41763
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4419 of 2025 1 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Rasela, Registration No. 1769, District - Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, Through Samiti Manager Pankaj Kumar Yadav, S/o Laxman Yadav, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Rasela, District - Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Dist - Raipur,
Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited Through Its Managing Director, Regd. Address - 6th Floor Tower -C, Commercial Complex Cbd Sector 21 Atal Nagar
Nawa
Raipur,
District
-
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh. 3 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation Ltd. Chhattisgarh, Gariyaband,
District
-
Gariyaband
Chhattisgarh 4 - Assistant Commissioner Cooperative Societies Gariyaband, District - Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 5 - Nodal Officer Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, District - Gariyaband Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Hari Agrawal, Advocate For State : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Deputy Government Advocate For Respondents No.2 and 3 : Shri Rakesh Jha, Advocate Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.08.25 19:08:44 +0530
2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 19/08/2025
1. At the outset, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3, on instructions, contends that a verification was done in presence of the Manager of the petitioner/society and no shortage was found in the society. Learned counsel places before this Court a verification report No.Ver.2425.1F dated 21.7.2025 showing that there is no shortage in transportation of the paddy and there is no need to recover any amount from the petitioner/society. The report is taken on record.
2. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner/society submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in future if any cause of action arises/survives.
3. The instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/-
(Arvind Kumar Verma)
JUDGE Gopal