Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38068 (CHH)

ADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4419/2025 · 2025-08-18

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:41763 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4419 of 2025 1 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Rasela, Registration No. 1769, District - Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, Through Samiti Manager Pankaj Kumar Yadav, S/o Laxman Yadav, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Rasela, District - Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Dist - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited Through Its Managing Director, Regd. Address - 6th Floor Tower -C, Commercial Complex Cbd Sector 21 Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation Ltd. Chhattisgarh, Gariyaband, District - Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 4 - Assistant Commissioner Cooperative Societies Gariyaband, District - Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 5 - Nodal Officer Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, District - Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Hari Agrawal, Advocate For State : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Deputy Government Advocate For Respondents No.2 and 3 : Shri Rakesh Jha, Advocate Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.08.25 19:08:44 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 19/08/2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3, on instructions, contends that a verification was done in presence of the Manager of the petitioner/society and no shortage was found in the society. Learned counsel places before this Court a verification report No.Ver.2425.1F dated 21.7.2025 showing that there is no shortage in transportation of the paddy and there is no need to recover any amount from the petitioner/society. The report is taken on record. 2. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner/society submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in future if any cause of action arises/survives. 3. The instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Gopal