1 2025:CGHC:37929 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6018 of 2025 Manish S/o Krishan Aged About 30 Years R/o Julana Ward No. 1, Police Station And Tahsil - Julana, District- Jind Haryana (Haryana) ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Outpost- Belgahna, Police Station- Kota, District- Bilaspur, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Vipin Singh Thakur, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 01/08/2025 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 224/2024 registered at Police Station Outpost- Belgahna, Police Station- Kota, District- Bilaspur (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 20(B)(II-C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. 2 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the on March 12, 2024, at 17:30 hours, the applicant/accused was found in possession of 50 kilograms of narcotic substance (ganja) worth Rs.5,00,000/-, kept in two white bags, near Manish Dhaba, Kenda Chowki, Belgahna, Bilaspur District. A vehicle bearing registration No. CG 12 R 2699 and the accused's mobile phone were seized, and he was arrested. After investigation, a charge sheet was filed, hence, the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in jail since 12.03.2024. He further submits that the alleged cannabis has not been recovered from the exclusive possession of the applicant, further the mandatory provisions with regard to search and seizure were not complied with in this case. He also submits that so far as criminal antecedent of the applicant is concerned, applicant has one criminal antecedent of the year 2023 under the NDPS Act in the State of Haryana, further the conclusion of the trial may take quite long time. Accordingly, he prays for enlarging the applicant on regular bail. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State/non-applicant opposes the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court. She further submits that the quantity of contraband article i.e. 50 Kgs of Ganja recovered from the possession of the applicant, which is much above the commercial quantity as notified under the NDPS Act, further the applicant has one criminal antecedent of the year 2023 3 under the NDPS Act in the State of Haryana, therefore, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. From perusal of the case diary, it transpires that the contraband articles i.e. 50 Kgs of Ganja recovered from the possession of the applicant is much above the prescribed commercial quantity threshold and counsel for the applicant has failed to give plausible explanation regarding the same, so far as criminal antecedent of the applicant is concerned, applicant has one criminal antecedent of the year 2023 under the NDPS Act in the State of Haryana, as such, he is a habitual offender, also in light of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Deepak Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another, reported in (2022) 8 SCC 559, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court had cancelled the bail granted to the accused therein on the ground that the accused had previous antecedents, this Court is of the opinion that is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application of the applicant - Manish, involved in Crime No. 224/2024 registered at Police Station Outpost- Belgahna, Police Station- Kota, District- Bilaspur (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 20(B)(II-C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, is rejected. 8. Needless to say that the trial Court concerned is at liberty to proceed and conclude the trial expeditiously. 4 9. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Akhil