2025:UHC:1823-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA 17TH MARCH, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 91 OF 2024 (S/B) Bala Dutt Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand And Others …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner. : Sri Amish Tewari and Mr. Kailash Chandra, learned counsel. Counsel for the State. : Sri S.S. Chaudhary, learned Standing Counsel. JUDGMENT : (per Sri G. Narendar, C.J.) After hearing the matter for some time, we have directed payment of pension for the undisputed period. Further hearing reveals that a lot more particulars are required to demonstrate the case of the petitioner. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays leave to withdraw the petition, and file a fresh petition on the same cause of action, after furnishing better particulars. 3. Reserving such liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. _______________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. _________________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 17th March, 2025 UJJWAL 1