CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFR, M/S VUDA, VISAKHAPATNAM v. ASST COMMR OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM & ANR
WP/39087/2012 · 2025-07-03
Ninala Jayasurya, Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3806 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3806 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010022922012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.39087 of 2012 Between: M/s.Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, 3rd Floor, VUDA Complex, Siripuram, Visakhapatnam – 530 003, Rep. by its Chief Accounts Officer, Smt.D.Vijaya Bharathi. … Petitioner
AND Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam, Circle–1(1), 4th Floor, Pratyakshakar Bhavan, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam – 530 017, and another. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.Ch.Pushyam Kiran Counsel for the Respondents : Mr.Vijay Kumar Punna This Court delivered the following ORDER: (per NJS,J)
Though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even on 20.6.2025 also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the writ petition.
2. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non–prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J
____________________________ TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO,J July 04, 2025 vasu