Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38050 (BOM)

SHI MAHADEV SITARAM NAVALE and ORS. v. BABURAO RAMCHANDRA NAVALE(SINCE DECD. THR. LRS) SMT. MANUKABAI BABURAO NAVALE and ORS.

IA/1399/2020 · 2025-02-27

Gauri Godse

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

201.10.94 sa.docx Iresh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 10 OF 1994 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1399 OF 2020 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 10 OF 1994 Mahadev Sitaram Navale and ors .....Appellants Vs. Baburao Ramchandra Navale and ors .....Respondents Mr. Amol Sakpal Advocate for the Appellants Mr. Ajit Kenjale a/w Mr. Sai Rajendra Kadam for respondent nos. 1A to 1F Ms. Ashwin Kapadnis for respondent nos. 3 to 5 CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 6th MARCH 2025 ORDER: 1. Pursuant to the order passed in the first session, the original document was produced before the learned Registrar (Judicial-I). The verified photocopy of the original document is marked ‘X’ with today’s date. The verified document is taken on record. The report of the learned Registrar (Judicial-I) records that the original document is returned to the learned advocate for the appellants. 1/2 IRESH MASHAL Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2025.03.07 18:04:34 +0530 201.10.94 sa.docx 2. Learned counsel for the appellants has tendered an application in the form of a praecipe for leave to delete respondent no. 2. The application/praecipe is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that respondent no. 2 has expired and her heirs are on record in different capacity as respondent nos. 3 and 4. Hence, the appellants are permitted to delete respondent no. 2. 4. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 5. List the appeal on 13th March 2025 for further hearing. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2