Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38049 (BOM)

PURUSHOTTAM LAXMAN AKHADE AND ANR. v. PRADIP RAMRAO BANSODE AND ORS.

WP/2730/2010 · 2025-07-15

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

3-WP-2730-2010.doc Pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2730 OF 2010 Purushottam Laxman Akhade & Anr. .. Petitioners Versus Pradip Ramrao Bansode & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. A. P. Kulkarni a/w Mr. Abhishek Roy for petitioners. Mr. Tejas D. Deshmukh a/w Ronak Utagikar for respondent no.8. CORAM: ALOK ARADHE, CJ. DATE: 15th JULY, 2025 ORAL ORDER: 1. In this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek to quash and set aside the order dated 22nd March, 2010 passed by the learned Ad-hoc District Judge -1, Solapur in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 33 of 2010 by which the order of injunction granted by the trial court by order dated 16th February, 2010 has been partly modified. 2. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the instant writ petition be disposed of with the direction to the trial court to conclude the proceeding in the suit, if the same is still pending, within a period of three months. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission and taking into account the fact that the order dated 22nd March, 2010 has remained in force for a period of 15 years, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the trial court to 1 PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Digitally signed by PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2025.07.15 19:49:33 +0530 3-WP-2730-2010.doc dispose of the civil suit, namely, Regular Civil Suit No. 872 of 2008, if not already decided, within a period of three months from today. (CHIEF JUSTICE) 2