IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 160 of 2025 Date of Decision: 12.11.2025 _______________________________________________________ Dalip Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Reeta Hingmang, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Careful perusal of the compliance affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents clearly reveals that mandate contained in the order/judgment sought to be executed stands duly complied with. While fairly acknowledging the factum of compliance, learned counsel for the petitioner states that benefit of ACP after four and nine years has been granted, but benefit after completion of 14 years is to be granted, which fact has been duly acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Additional Advocate General states that as and when period of 14 years is completed, petitioner shall be granted such benefit. 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is disposed of. Liberty is 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievances, if any. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 12, 2025 (shankar)