APHC010685812014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: Avula Pedda Mallaiah Siddavatam Chengappa Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G VENKATA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3365] THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3451/2014 Avula Pedda Mallaiah ...PETITIONER AND Siddavatam Chengappa ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: G VENKATA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: [3365] THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT 2 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the revision petitioner is present. 02. Despite of service of notice, none entered appearance on behalf of respondents. 03. In O.S.No.267 of 2022, a money decree was passed on 18.08.2003 and the Judgment Debtor (J.Dr) did not discharge the debt amount. The Decree Holder (D.Hr) filed E.P.No.74 of 2009 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Piler seeking arrest and detention of the Judgment Debtor (J.Dr) in civil prison for realization of the decree amount and the same was allowed. Aggrieved by the order dated 28.07.2014 in E.P.No.74/2009, this revision petition is filed. 04. On 26.09.2014, this Court passed the following Order: “… On condition that the petitioner deposits the E.P. amount in two equal installments, the first within four weeks from today and the second within four weeks thereafter, there shall be stay of his arrest. In case of default in payment of either of the two installments, the interim order shall stand automatically vacated”. 05. Sri Avula Pedda Mallaiah, is the revision petitioner. This revision petition was filed in the year 2014, by that time as per the 3 cause title he was ninety (90) years old. The very earnest submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that, despite of their best efforts, they are unable to gain contact with the revision petitioner. 06. Considering the above facts, this present revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Both parties are entitled to explore their rights in duly instituted proceedings if and when so they desire. The dismissal of this revision has not bearing on the rights and duties of the parties. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stands closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE DR. V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR Date:20.03.2025 KKV 4 153 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DR. V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3451/2014 Dated 20.03.2025 KKV