Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38039 (AP)

SETTY TULASI KRISHNA v. SETTY BHANU SRI

CRLP/10049/2022 · 2025-02-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010685542022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL Between: Setty Tulasi Krishna and Others Setty Bhanu Sri and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. C SUBODH The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioner Accused Nos.1 and 2, seeking quashment them in C.C.No.201 of 2018 Magistrate, Vijayawada. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE -PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10049 OF 2022 Setty Tulasi Krishna and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND Setty Bhanu Sri and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioner seeking quashment of the proceedings .No.201 of 2018 on the file of IV Additional Chief Metropolitan IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioners/ of the proceedings pending against Chief Metropolitan 2. Sri N. Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the relief has become infructuous and petition may be disposed of. 3. Ms. K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State are in attendance. 4. In that view, the Criminal Petition is dismissed, since relief has become infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.02.2025 KK