LPA-3068-2024 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (108) LPA-3068-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : September 24, 2025 Punjab State Warehousing Corporation .. Appellant Versus State of Punjab and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate and Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. T.P.S. Chawla, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Anil Chawla, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.5. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) CM-7553-LPA-2024 Present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 83 days in re-filing the appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 83 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. LPA-3068-2024 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though, liberty was given to the litigating parties to resolve the issue amicably but the same is not being done despite the fact that the grievance raised by the appellant before the Union of India is still pending consideration. HARSHA RANI 2025.09.25 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA-3068-2024 (O&M) 2 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.5-Union of India submits that as per his information, no such grievance has reached the competent authority for consideration and in case any such grievance is raised even henceforth by the appellant, the same will be decided by the competent authority by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3. Keeping in view the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present appeal and the same is accordingly disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE September 24, 2025 (RAMESH KUMARI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.09.25 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document