1 2025:CGHC:38078 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8906 of 2025 1 - Rajendra Manik S/o Laloram Manik, Aged About 56 Years Occupation Assistant Grade-III in the Department of Education Jashpur, At Present R/o Village Dokda, Post Dokda, Tehsil Kansabel, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 2 - Collector, District Jashpur, Collector Office Campus, District Jashpur (CG) 3 - District Education Officer, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh). 4 - Block Education Officer, Block Kansabel, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 5 - Principal, Government Higher Secondary School Devri, Block Kansabel, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri Vijay Sahu, Advocate. For State : Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 01.08. 202 5 1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order dated 30.06.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Block Kansabel to Block Manora on administrative exigency. 2. After arguing for sometimes, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, there is a provision under clause 8 of the transfer policy dated 05-06-2025 for making a representation before the transfer committee. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the 2 present petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the said transfer committee and the said transfer committee may be directed to decide the representation, so filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law within the stipulated time frame. 3. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the State counsel and would submit that he has no objection if such a direction is to be given to the transfer committee to decide the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within the stipulated time frame. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to make a representation before the transfer committee as provided under Clause-8 of the said transfer policy dated 05-06-2025. If such representation is made to the said committee, the same shall be decided in accordance with law on its own merits within a further period of one month from the date of receipt of representation along with copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observation/liberty the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder