[2025:RJ-JP:29123] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3857/2025 Babulal Barala S/o Shri Jagdish Parsad Barala, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Nayabas, Tankrada, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) Other Address- Ward Number-12, Near Maheshwari School. Barala Bhawan, Naya Bazar, Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus Dr. Bhawani Singh Barala S/o Shri Shyamlal Barala, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Plot Number C- 4 Hathi Babu Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1593/2025 Babulal Barala S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Barala, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Nayabas, Tankrada, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). Other Address- Ward Number 12, Near Maheshwari School, Barala Bhawan, Naya Bazar, Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus Dr Bhawani Singh Barala S/o Shri Shyamlal Barala, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Plot Number C-4, Hathi Babu Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma Mr. Manraj Jat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 31/07/2025 The present bunch of petitions are filed assailing the impugned order whereby an application by the petitioner under Section 91 Cr.P.C., with a prayer to call for enquiry report from Income Tax Officer and Bank Officer is rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the fact qua non- maintenance of Books of Account by the [2025:RJ-JP:29123] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-3857/2025] respondents is undisputed. It is further submitted that presence of Income Tax Officer and Bank Officer is of vital importance to make out the case and is necessary for fair trial. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the petitioners filing applications in a repeated manner, merely as a tactic to delay the proceedings. Further, reliance is placed upon the order dated 09.12.2024 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.8235/2024 filed by the petitioner therein seeking akin relief, which was dismissed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Having heard the submissions of the learned counsel and upon perusal of the impugned order dated 20.05.2025, this Court has noted that the said order is an interlocutory order; that the matter pertains to the Year 2016; that as per the mandate of Section 143 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, the proceedings shall be concluded expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months. The relevant portion of the impugned order dated 20.05.2025 is reproduced herein below: - “mHk;i{kdkjku }kjk cgl ds nkSjku fn;s x;s rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA i=koyh ds voyksdu ls U;k;ky; ds le{k loZizFke ;g n`f"Vxr vk;k fd vfHk;qDr }kjk mDr vk’k; dk izkFkZuk i= i=koyh ds lk{; izfrj{kk ds Lrj ij is’k fd;k x;k gSA vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr }kjk viuh vksj ls mDr izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj dFku fd;k gS fd ifjoknh MkW- Hkokuh flag us ifjokn vkSj lk{; ’kiFk i= esa dgk gS fd mlus vfHk;qDr dks 7]00]000@& :i;s udn fn, FksA fdarq mlus bruh cM+h jde dk lzksr ugha crk;kA ifjoknh us U;k;ky; ds le{k fu/kkZj.k o"kZ 2017&18] 2020&21] ,oa 2022&2023 ds vk;dj lax.kuk] rqyu i= vkfn is’k fd, gSA mDr vk;dj lax.kuk] rqyu i= vkfn esa ifjoknh us vfHk;qDr dks lkr yk[k :i;s ukjaxh cjkyk dks ukS yk[k :i;s] pUnz ’ks[kj dks 1]10]000@& :i;s ,oa fofo/k O;fDr;ksa dks 4]85]000@&:i;s dqy 21]95]000@&:i;s udn fn;k tkuk crk;k gS tcfd ;g Lo;a 10]00]000@& dk dtZnkj gSA ifjoknh us izfrijh{kk esa Lohdkj fd;k gS fd og fglkc fdrkc dh iqLrdsa ugha j[krk gSA ifjoknh dh mijksDr Lohd``fr lqlaxr gSA blfy, mDr rqyu i= vkfn dh vk;dj foHkkx }kjk tkap djok;k tkuk vko’;d gS rFkk ifjoknh ds mijksDr ysu nsu dks lR;kfir djus vkSj vk;dj vf/kfu;e ds lqlaxr mica/kksa ds mYya?ku dh iqf"V ds fy, fo}ku vk;dj vf/kdkjh okMZ¼7½¼1½ t;iqj ckck fl)ukFk Hkou] [2025:RJ-JP:29123] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-3857/2025] ykydksBh] tuiFk] t;iqj dks lwpuk fHktok;h tkos vkSj tkap fjiksVZ ,oa ifjoknh dh mDr o"kksZ dh vk;dj foojf.k;ksa ds lkFk fo}ku vk;dj vf/kdkjh dks lk{; ds fy, cqyk;k tkos bl laca/k esa U;k;ky; dk fouez er gS fd vfHk;qDr }kjk blh vk’k; dk izkFkZuk i= iwoZ esa fnukad 05-10- 2024 dks izkFkZuk i= is’k fd;k Fkk tks fnukad 25-11-2024 dks fuLrkfjr fd;k tkdj [kkfjt fd;k x;kA rRi’pkr ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; esa mDr vkns’k ds fo#) ;kfpdk vfHk;qDr }kjk is’k dh xbZ ftlesa vfHk;qDr dks xokg is’k djus dh Lora=rk nsrs gq, ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh xbZA mlds ckn iqu% mUgha vk/kkjksa ij izkFkZuk i= fnukad 08-01-2025 dks is’k fd;k x;k Fkk ftls U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 13-02-2025 dks vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k x;k ftlds Ik’pkr iqu% vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr }kjk gLrxr izkFkZuk i= rhljh ckj izLrqr fd;k x;k gS tks fd muds izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k esa ek= foyac dkfjr djus ds mn~~ns’; dks izdV djrk gSA lkFk gh vfHk;qDr }kjk bl izdkj ckj ckj ,d gh vk’k; dk izkFkZuk i= is’k fd, tkus ls U;k;ky; dk le; Hkh fuf’pr :i ls cckZn gksrk gS rFkk vU; izdj.kksa esa O;o/kku mRiUu gksrk gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa mDr izkFkZuk i= dks iks"k.kh; ugha gksus ls vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA vr% vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr mDr izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj fd;k tkdj 5]000@& :i;s v{kjs ikap gtkj :i;s dksLV ij [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA dksLV dh vnk;xh vkns’k dh iwoZorhZ ’krZ jgsxhA vkns’k vkt lquk;k x;kA i=koyh okLrs lk{; izfrj{kk fnukad 03-06-2025 dks is’k gksA*” Taking note of the aforementioned, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. In view of the above, the present petitions are dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/33-34