Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38016 (CHH)

DONESH KUMAR PAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8948/2025 · 2025-08-10

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8948 of 2025 1 - Donesh Kumar Pal S/o Mohan Lal Pal Aged About 36 Years R/o Village - Patewa, Nawapara, Tehsil - Abhanpur, District - Raipur (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector, District Mahasamund, C.G. 4 - Divisional Joint Director, School Education Division, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer, District Mahasamund, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate. For State : Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 11.08. 202 5 1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 01.06.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Jhalap, Block Mahasamund to Temri, Block Saraipali under the Teachers Rationalization Instructions. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional 2 Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder